BLOG

The Teaching Structure No One Showed You

By Gail Boushey Published: 2/16/2026 Updated: 2/17/2026

Quick question:

Can you visualize the structure of an effective literacy block in your mind right now?

Not the content you're teaching (phonics, comprehension, vocabulary). Not the program you're using (Amplify, Fundations, UFLI).

The structure. The flow. The organization of time and instructional moves that makes student learning possible.

Most teachers can't—and that's not a personal failing. We were prepared to deliver lessons, not to carry a clear mental map of the whole block that learning research keeps pointing back to.

If Your School Uses a Science of Reading Program

If your school uses a Science of Reading program—Amplify, Fundations, UFLI, Wit & Wisdom, or others—this structure works WITH your program, not instead of it.

Your program tells you WHAT to teach during explicit instruction: systematic phonics, decoding strategies, comprehension skills.

The Teaching Structure shows you HOW to organize the time before and after that instruction so:

  • Students get the extended, focused practice and feedback they need
  • You have space for responsive teaching instead of racing the clock

Your program's lesson plan is one component of this structure. The structure shows you what happens during the other 45–60 minutes of your literacy block—without adding extra "programs" or competing philosophies.


Most teachers haven't visualized the structure in this way

Most teachers were never shown a visual map of how instructional time should be organized. We were given programs with lesson plans. We were told to "do guided reading," "run centers," or "follow the pacing guide."

But nobody named the underlying structure—the framework that holds it all together and makes responsive teaching possible.

So we teach by intuition, by trial and error, by piecing together bits from different programs and hoping it works.

Some teachers eventually build a mental structure, but it can take years. And during that time, the students who most need consistent routines and targeted support are the ones most at risk of missing out.

What if you could see the structure right now?


The missing piece: A visual structure

Here's what changes everything:

A visual map showing exactly how instructional time is organized—not just what happens in sequence, but what happens simultaneously.

This isn't about a specific program or curriculum. It's the universal structure underneath effective teaching: brief focused input, scaffolded practice, extended independent work with feedback, and time to consolidate learning. Different researchers give it different names, but the pattern is the same.

When you can see this structure, you can:

  • Identify exactly where your teaching breaks down
  • Know which practices to strengthen first
  • Organize any content (literacy, math, science, writing) effectively
  • Make responsive teaching actually possible instead of aspirational
  • Create more predictable, equitable experiences for students who depend on structure the most

The structure has four components. And one of them—the diagonal line—reveals something most teachers have never been able to see.


The Complete Flow: Four Components

Here's the Teaching Structure that expert teachers hold in their minds (and that many programs quietly assume you already know).  
COMPONENT 1: Brief, Focused Lesson (10–15 minutes)  
This is explicit instruction on one clear learning target. It's where your program's lesson plan fits—the systematic phonics lesson, the comprehension strategy, the math concept.

Within this brief window, you move through a full gradual release of responsibility:

  • Explaining and modeling – “I show you how.”
  • Thinking aloud – “I show you what's in my head.”
  • Guiding – “We do this together.”
  • Offering suggestions – “I coach while you try.”
  • Giving feedback – "I confirm or correct in real time."

By the end of this short lesson, students have moved from watching you to trying the work with your support. Research on effective instruction points to this pattern: teach one thing clearly, in small steps, with modeling and guided practice rather than long, dense explanations that overload working memory.

Crucially, this gradual release is embedded inside the 8–15 minute lesson. You're not bolting on separate 10‑minute "guided practice" blocks. You're moving fluidly through these moves within one focused lesson.

Why it's brief: Cognitive load research shows students can only hold 3–7 new pieces of information in working memory at once. Longer lessons don't increase learning—they increase cognitive overload.

COMPONENT 2: Set a Purpose (30 seconds–2 minutes)

Before students practice independently, they need to know exactly what they are practicing and why it matters.

In this quick step you:

  • Name the learning goal in student‑friendly language
  • Point to 1–2 success criteria ("You'll know you're doing this when…")
  • Connect today's work to something they already know

For example: "Today while you practice, you're applying what we just learned about breaking -ing words into the base word and the ending. Your job is to notice and try that every time you see an -ing word."

This tiny move does a lot of heavy lifting. It sharpens students' attention, supports multilingual learners and students with IEPs by making expectations concrete, and activates metacognition so students monitor themselves instead of waiting for you to tell them if they're “right.”

COMPONENT 3: Extended Independent Practice + Responsive Teaching (30–40 minutes)

This is where the diagonal line appears on the visual map—and where most teachers say, "No one ever showed me this before."

While students practice independently, you are providing responsive teaching through conferring and small‑group instruction. These two things happen simultaneously, not sequentially.

On the visual, the diagonal line represents how much support you are giving and how much independent time students are getting:

  • Students higher on the diagonal are with you in a conference or small group. They get more direct support and less independent time in that moment.
  • Students lower on the diagonal are working on their own. They get more uninterrupted practice and less direct support right then.

That diagonal line reveals the real flexibility inside every instructional block:

  • Students who need more help get less independent time because you're actively teaching them
  • Students who don't need help at that moment get more independent time to build automaticity
  • Your role shifts from "lesson deliverer" to "responsive teacher," deciding who needs you now and what kind of support will move them forward

This is where equity lives in the structure: support is distributed based on need, not on who raises a hand first or who happens to be in a fixed group.

During this time, you might:

  • Pull a small group on a new strategy
  • Pull a small group to revisit the whole‑group strategy
  • Confer one‑on‑one with a student who's stuck
  • Confer with a student who's ready for extension

Meanwhile, the rest of the class is practicing the day's purpose with clear routines and expectations. That combination—students working with purpose, you moving along the diagonal—is what turns instruction into durable learning.

This is the structure that ensures every student gets what they need to actually learn—not just hear the lesson, but transfer it to long-term memory through supported practice and responsive teaching.

And once routines are built, this component actually reduces your mental load. You're not constantly asking "What now?"; you're working inside a familiar pattern and focusing on "Who now?" and “What do they need?”

COMPONENT 4

Review and Reflect

(5–10 minutes)

A short closing brings the block together:

  • Students share where they used the strategy or skill 
  • You highlight a few concrete examples 
  • Together you connect back to the purpose you set at the start

This is where learning is named, reinforced, and prepared for tomorrow. It can be simple—turn‑and‑talk, a quick written example, a couple of share‑outs—but it keeps new learning from fading and lets all students, not just the most vocal, see themselves as thinkers and readers.

Why it matters: Neuroscience research on memory consolidation shows that learning not reviewed within 24 hours is largely lost. This component moves learning into long-term memory.

How This Works WITH Science of Reading

Some teachers wonder: How does this work with my Science of Reading program?

The Teaching Structure is not a literacy approach and it doesn't replace your curriculum. It's a way to organize time around how learning actually happens—whether you're teaching phonemic awareness, decoding, language comprehension, or anything else. 

Understanding Your Block vs. Your Lesson 

Important clarification: The Teaching Structure organizes your entire literacy block (60–90 minutes), not just a single 15‑minute lesson.

Your Science of Reading program provides lesson plans for Component 1—the brief, focused instruction:

  • Systematic phonics
  • Explicit comprehension strategies
  • Vocabulary instruction

The Teaching Structure shows you what happens during the rest of the block:

  • How students practice what you just taught (Component 3) 
  • What YOU do while they practice (Component 3—responsive teaching along the diagonal) 
  • How you bring it all together so learning sticks (Component 4) 
  • Where you set a clear purpose so all students understand the goal (Component 2)

Think of it this way:

  • Your program's lesson plan = 15 minutes of explicit instruction (Component 1) 
  • The Teaching Structure = The full 60–90 minute block around it 

How They Work Together 

Your Science of Reading program provides:

  • What phonics patterns to teach and when
  • What decodable texts to use
  • What comprehension strategies to teach explicitly

The Teaching Structure provides:

  • How to organize your 60–90 minute block around that instruction 
  • When students practice with those decodables and connected tasks 
  • How you structure time for small‑group phonics intervention 
  • Where responsive teaching happens so no one slips through the cracks

Your program tells you WHAT to teach in that 15‑minute lesson. The structure shows you HOW to organize the time before and after so students get the practice and support they need to actually learn it.

A quick example:

Your Fundations lesson has you teach the suffix ‑ing on Tuesday. That 15‑minute lesson is Component 1, with gradual release built in. You then:

  • Set a brief purpose for practice (Component 2) 
  • Have students read and write words with ‑ing in decodable texts while you confer and pull a group who need more support (Component 3) 
  • Close by inviting students to share ‑ing words they read or wrote successfully (Component 4)

The program provides the content. The structure organizes the time.

The Structure Is Repeatable

Here's another powerful feature of this structure: it scales and repeats.

In a 45‑minute block, you might use the structure once. In a 90‑minute literacy block, you might cycle through it two or three times with different teaching points.

The pattern stays the same; you simply repeat it. 

Example: a 90‑minute literacy block

Cycle 1 – Phonics (≈30 minutes)

  • Component 1: Brief phonics lesson with gradual release (10–15 min) 
  • Component 2: Purpose for decoding practice 
  • Component 3: Students read and write words with the new pattern while you confer and pull groups 
  • Component 4: Quick share / error check

Cycle 2 – Reading Comprehension (≈30 minutes)

  • Component 1: Brief strategy lesson
  • Component 2: Purpose ("Use this while you read today…")
  • Component 3: Students read and apply the strategy; you confer and pull groups
  • Component 4: Students share where they used the strategy

Cycle 3 – Writing (≈30 minutes)

  • Component 1: Brief writing craft or conventions lesson 
  • Component 2: Purpose for writing time 
  • Component 3: Students write while you confer 
  • Component 4: Author's chair / reflection

Same structure. Different content. Multiple cycles.

Once you know the pattern, you can flex it across block lengths and subjects without losing coherence.

This is what makes the structure so powerful: learn it once, use it everywhere, repeat it as needed.

What Makes the Teaching Structure Different 

You'll see these components—brief instruction, gradual release, independent practice, responsive teaching, consolidation—in effective teaching everywhere. That's because they're based on cognitive science research about how students actually learn, not on any specific teaching philosophy or curriculum.

The Teaching Structure gives you three things together:

  • The map showing how instructional time is organized (with the diagonal line revealing simultaneity, support, and flexibility)
  • The practices that make each component work
  • The diagnostic tool showing where to focus your growth

Seeing all three in one place makes expert practice visible, explicit, and teachable.

If you already teach this way, this framework gives you the language to coach others and the diagnostic tool to see where beginning teachers struggle.

If you're still developing these practices, this framework shows you exactly what to work on, where, and how. 

The Diagnostic Capability 

The map doesn't just show you what expert teaching looks like. It shows you where YOUR teaching breaks down.

  • Whole group lessons running too long? You need to strengthen Component 1. 
  • Students can't work independently? You need to build the routines and stamina that make Component 3 possible. 
  • Don't know what to do during practice time? You need to develop the conferring and small group practices for Component 3. 
  • Learning doesn't stick? You need Component 4.

The teaching structure shows you exactly where your gaps are. And once you know where your gaps are, you know exactly what practices to strengthen.

This is how teacher learning drives student learning. When you strengthen the practices that support each component of the structure, your students get better instruction, more practice time, and more responsive support. Teacher growth is directly tied to student outcomes. When teachers learn, students learn.

This Works Across All Content Areas

The Teaching Structure isn't just for literacy.

It's the universal organization of effective teaching in any subject:

Math: Brief lesson on adding fractions (with gradual release embedded) → Set purpose → Students practice problems independently while you confer and pull small groups → Review and reflection

Science: Brief lesson on photosynthesis (with gradual release embedded) → Set purpose → Students conduct investigations independently while you check in and support → Review findings

Writing: Brief lesson on paragraph structure (with gradual release embedded) → Set purpose → Students write independently while you confer → Share and reflect

The structure stays the same. The content changes.

Because the structure is based on how students learn, not on what they're learning.

Where This Fits in the Teach Daily Platform 

The Teaching Structure is the backbone of everything we teach at Teach Daily.

When you join us, you:

  • Learn the map deeply 
  • Use it to notice where your teaching feels strong and where it feels wobbly 
  • Build specific practices to strengthen those components over time

When teachers learn, students learn.

The structure shows you what to learn. The courses teach you how. Your students experience the results.

Every course, tool, and resource connects back to this structure. That keeps professional learning focused and manageable instead of scattered and overwhelming.

The Research Foundation 

The Teaching Structure synthesizes decades of research:

  • Rosenshine (2012): Principles of explicit instruction
  • Pearson & Gallagher (1983), Fisher & Frey (2008): Gradual release of responsibility
  • Sweller: Cognitive load theory (why lessons must be brief and focused)
  • Dehaene (2009): How learning transfers from working memory to long-term memory
  • Hattie (2009): Feedback and formative assessment as highest-impact interventions
  • Shaywitz (2020): Practice requirements for reading skill automaticity
  • Ericsson: Deliberate practice research (why extended practice time matters)

Each component is backed by extensive research. The structure itself has been implemented by over 1.5 million teachers across 20 years—first through Daily 5 and CAFE in literacy, now extended as a universal framework across all subjects through Prepared Classroom.

Ready to See It in Action?

You don't need years of trial and error to discover this structure on your own. You need the map, the practices, and support as you build them.

The Teaching Structure offers all three—steadily, respectfully, and in ways that honor both the science of learning and the realities of today's classrooms.

Join us. Learn the structure. Build the practices. Transform your teaching.

Want to learn more? Explore The Structure of Teaching.

References & Further Reading

  • Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read
  • Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better Learning Through Structured Teaching
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses
  • Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). “The Instruction of Reading Comprehension”
  • Rosenshine, B. (2012). “Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies”
  • Shaywitz, S. (2020). Overcoming Dyslexia (Second Edition)
  • Sweller, J. (1988). “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning”

Save Favorite

Login or create a free account to save your favorites.

LoginCreate Account